Checking in on Pravda... – HotAir

As you would expect, Pravda is so far aligning with the Democratic Party take that this is an illegal war against a not particularly nice, but not at all dangerous group of avuncular clerics who are terribly misunderstood. 

Certainly, they are not as bad as Trump, or God forbid, Scott Adams. 

Some media figures are downright hostile, while others are cautious to the extent that they want to see which way the wind blows. But they are also creating wind breaks to ensure as much as possible that no good news about Operation Epic Fury escapes into the public realm. 

Such as the producer of this local news show, who tried to get a reporter to ignore the fact that Persians in America were celebrating. He was supposed to only focus on the communists attacking Trump, but chose not to. 

ABC seems to be among the worst players in Pravda, if you exclude M-SNOW (the old MSNBC). It has become not just the broadcaster of The View, but rather the news outlet for Whoopi Goldberg’s view of the world. 

The New York Times and Washington Post did exactly what you would expect, eulogizing the worst people in the world as they drop like flies. We learn about the theater preferences of the Ayatollah, and about how the Iranians really don’t mean any of that “Death to Israel” or “Death to America” stuff. 

Do you like Les Misérables? Well, the Ayatollah did too! No doubt, if the New York Times were writing Hitler’s obituary today, they would go into his dog breed preferences and his love for the arts. 

He was a compelling speaker, too!

There was a time when the anti-American propaganda in the media would be shocking, but we have reached a point where the average Persian Gulf leader is more pro-American than almost any news anchor. 

And it is a worldwide phenomenon, because the media is no longer regional, but driven by a transnational agenda. There is a class of internationalists who populate the political and cultural elites who are irredeemably hostile to Donald Trump, obviously, but also American leadership. 

I was going to say “American power,” but it’s not really our power that bothers them. They love it as long as they can control it. 

The hostility to Trump is based on his refusal to be controlled by them, even to the extent that he was during his first term. 

Trump was much more likely to listen to the advice of establishment folks in his first term, but his exile from office during the Biden regency taught him many lessons, and obviously he took them to heart. 

The extent to which journalists can control the narrative has been shrinking, and if Operation Epic Fury turns out to be as successful as it could and should be, that success will deliver another decisive blow to their credibility. 

To the extent that they have any left outside of the Democratic base, that is. And make no mistake, they do retain some credibility with an influential segment of Independents, even though that credibility is getting sanded away. 

One problem that the media faces in circumstances like this is that they can’t control what we see with our own eyes, and people’s eyes are glued to the spectacle. There is nothing like a spectacle to focus attention, and if this one ends with success and few casualties, no amount of spin will wipe out the images of Iranians celebrating in Tehran. 

ABC’s Ian Pannell argues after the Pentagon briefing that Americans should “concern[ed]” that Iran claims they’re “essentially…prepared for a long war”….

“[I]nterestingly, while that press conference was taking place, we heard from the Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Ali Larijani, someone who was very close to the Ayatollah, essentially saying and posting Iran, unlike the United States, has prepared for a long war, and I think that should be a pause — and a cause for concern for many of us. We saw what happened in Afghanistan. We saw what happened in Iraq and other conflicts. I think the key questions are to what extent can Iran maintain cohesion in terms of command and control, and to what extent it can maintain the ability to project strength and attacks.”

Trump’s war is with many foes at once. 

Iran, obviously. Islamists, certainly. Internationalists, beyond doubt. China and Russia, who are already defeated in this battle. 

And the media, for certain. If he wins the war cleanly, they lose big time. 

When the dust settles, if it does so on a collapsed regime in Tehran, Trump’s victory over the Islamists will signal a victory over the transnationalists as well. Trump will have dismantled their decades-old policies and the credibility of any number of institutions. 

Trump has made a risky bet here, and the initial successes do not guarantee ultimate strategic victory. 

But I sure wouldn’t bet against Trump winning. 

Editor’s note: If we thought our job in pushing back against the Academia/media/Democrat censorship complex was over with the election, think again. This is going to be a long fight. If you want to join the conversation in the comments — and support independent platforms — why not join our VIP Membership program? Choose VIP to support Hot Air and access our premium content, VIP Gold to extend your access to all Townhall Media platforms and participate in this show, or VIP Platinum to get access to even more content and discounts on merchandise. Use the promo code FIGHT to join or to upgrade your existing membership level today, and get 60% off!

You May Also Like

Zendaya suits up in white on the Met Gala 2025 red carpet

Zendaya walked the Met Gala 2025 red carpet on Monday, posing in…

BREAKING: FBI Breaks Up (Another) Terror Plot in Michigan; UPDATE: Dearborn? – HotAir

Michiganders almost got a truly horrifying Halloween. Instead, FBI Director Kash…

Pamela Paul on Grievance Culture and ‘Progressive Stacking’ – HotAir

Just because you’ve been wronged, that doesn’t make your right, much less…

Woman Leaves Family Vacation After Learning MIL Excluded Her Kids Only, Gets Accused Of Ruining It

Family holidays can really bring out the worst in people, particularly if…