Editor’s note: The following contains spoilers for ‘A House of Dynamite’After an inexplicable eight-year hiatus, Kathryn Bigelow has returned to feature filmmaking in a familiar mode for her. The breakthrough Oscar-winning director remodeled herself as the voice of pressing, urgent American commentary on warfare and political unrest with her Best Picture winner, The Hurt Locker, and her equally acclaimed follow-up, Zero Dark Thirty. Bigelow’s latest film, A House of Dynamite, now available on Netflix, unfortunately misses the mark as a reflection of the precarious and harrowing political and military climate we live through today.
During A House of Dynamite‘s visceral and intense first act, we were gripping the edge of our seats watching the White House control room respond to an unknown enemy projectile. By the second chapter, when the perspective changed to the military command center, our interest waned, but we were still glued to the screen. Upon reaching the final chapter, following Idris Elba as the President repeating everything we’ve already seen, the film officially went off the rails. Worst of all, the film ignores any semblance of a conclusion, which is troublesome considering Bigelow’s history of crafting thoughtful, poignant endings.
‘A House of Dynamite’ Leaves Viewers Asking More
Aided by rave reviews from the Venice Film Festival and a stacked cast including Idris Elba, Rebecca Ferguson, Anthony Ramos, Greta Lee, Jared Harris, and Tracy Letts, A House of Dynamite looked to be a major cinematic event and potential Oscar player. Now that it’s widely available to stream on Netflix, its early goodwill has evaporated, with many viewers perplexed as to how a film with such promise, especially in its opening moments, could feel so flat, redundant, and empty. Broken up into three chapters, Bigelow’s Fail Safe-inspired treatise on institutional failure amid a nuclear weapons crisis follows an incident involving an unknown projectile targeting Chicago, which will lead to countless lives lost unless the White House and the Military-Industrial complex thwart the enemy missile.
A House of Dynamite is the ultimate tease of a film, as each chapter abruptly ends before the fateful missile strikes the United States. The film’s final shots consist of soldiers on their knees in anguish over this disastrous attack and a cavalcade of buses herding a group of people into a fallout shelter. Just when the audience expects to grapple with the harsh ramifications of this tragedy, the film cuts to black and the credits roll. Of course, the imagination is strong enough to picture what a nuclear attack on a metropolitan area might look like.
The viewer doesn’t need their hand held, but this refusal to engage with the fallout signals a lack of curiosity about the thematic weight of this scary but plausible crisis. Not only is going through the same plot beats dramatically inert by the third section, but following from the perspective of the POTUS without examining his power and responsibility in this situation is egregious. While it has its riveting moments and the usual technical craft on Bigelow’s part, A House of Dynamite devolves into a genre exercise that recalls political thrillers of yesteryear.
Kathryn Bigelow’s Accomplished Track Record Crafting Great Endings
Kathryn Bigelow’s previous wartime docudrama thrillers, The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty, are capped off by somber, deeply meditative endings that complete a central character arc and reflect a specific sentiment about America’s international affairs. For IED disarming expert William James (Jeremy Renner) in The Hurt Locker, every day is a near-death experience while serving in Iraq, but upon returning to civilian life and his loving family, he becomes dissatisfied and pivots right back to duty.
CIA intelligence analyst Maya (Jessica Chastain) laboriously tracks Osama bin Laden‘s whereabouts for a decade in Zero Dark Thirty. Rather than indulging in the jingoistic triumph of hunting down the orchestrator of the September 11th attacks, Bigelow concludes the film with a poignant coda suggesting the futility of justice and the emptiness of retribution, as Maya boards a plane and cries as the Navy SEALs celebrate on that monumental night in 2011.
Where A House of Dynamite is too concerned with the documentary-like depiction of control room ops, Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty are effectively gritty and lifelike while maintaining a thorough central character dynamic, evocative message, and emotional register. The overstuffed ensemble cast of Bigelow’s latest film provides no opportunity for palpable characterization, unlike the fleshed-out complexities portrayed by Jeremy Renner and Jessica Chastain.
Denying you the chance to experience the chaotic and nightmarish impact of the missile attack in A House of Dynamite is not a cunning subversion of audience expectations. Instead, it deprives the film of reaching the same profound heights as Bigelow’s previous dramas/thrillers, which reflected a defeated weariness about the Iraq War within the American psyche. Underlining the frantic madness of a nuclear crisis is nothing revelatory, and it’s hard to feel emotional sympathy for government employees in a time when morale in the American government is fairly low. We can see a candid portrait of how America operates in the wake of a tragedy, which Kathryn Bigelow only vaguely engages with in her disappointing return to the director’s chair.
A House of Dynamite is now available to stream on Netflix in the U.S.
- Release Date
-
October 10, 2025
- Runtime
-
113 minutes
- Director
-
Kathryn Bigelow
- Writers
-
Noah Oppenheim
