Did British leftwing rag The Guardian pull down its “Particular person of the Yr” ballot after an undesirable took a commanding lead? That’s the allegation being made after voting was abruptly shut down following the belief that J.K. Rowling was going to run away with it.

This per The Daily Wire.

Readers of the British newspaper, The Guardian, are accusing the outlet of deactivating an online poll that requested readers to vote on “Particular person of the Yr” after it turned obvious that J.Okay. Rowling would handily win.

“Inform us: who’s your 2021 individual of the yr?” ran the headline, posted on Dec. 15, with the subtitle, “Time Journal selected billionaire Tesla boss Elon Musk – however who can be your selection?” A short while later, when Rowling was far and away within the lead, the voting type disappeared together with the outcomes to that time. A message in small print acknowledged, “This manner has been deactivated and is closed to any additional submissions.”

Rowling has stirred international controversy over the previous few years as a result of she publicly believes that organic intercourse exists, and simply as importantly, that it issues. The famed writer was labeled a “transphobe” following feedback the place she sarcastically advised that solely girls might menstruate (see J.K. Rowling Returns Kennedy Humanitarian Award After the Group’s President Accuses Her of “Transphobia”).

Since then, she’s solely grow to be extra outspoken, drawing the ire of the trans-activist left at quite a few factors over the past yr. Rowling has largely confirmed “too huge” to cancel, although, and whereas she’s angered some, she’s additionally drawn a big base of assist for her willingness to talk plain, organic fact.

So did The Guardian cancel their ballot as a result of Rowling was going to win it? I can’t say for certain. You’d suppose if the polling interval had ended, that they’d replace the web page to say that. Additional, you’d anticipate a web-based ballot to have its outcomes launched pretty rapidly, if not instantly. As an alternative, a generic message in regards to the type being deactivated is the one bit of knowledge on a web page that in any other case seems to nonetheless be selling the ballot.

Let’s name it inconclusive, however possible simply to be secure. If it wasn’t pulled down, then we should always see Rowling given the crown shortly, proper? If not, then we now have our reply.

Nonetheless, I feel the truth that Rowling held such a commanding lead exhibits {that a} majority of individuals nonetheless keep some sanity in relation to trans ideology. Sure, individuals are free to put on and act as they please. However they aren’t entitled to others feeding their delusions, whether or not it’s using a vast quantity of pronouns or having to affirm dozens of various “genders” that don’t truly exist.

Source: Redstate

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Ukraine war: President Zelensky marks the anniversary of Russia’s invasion with a defiant message

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky today marked the first anniversary of Russia‘s full-scale…

John Lennon’s ‘unwanted’ Grammy Award for sale

10 December 2023 A Grammy Award given to the late John Lennon…

EFCC arrests ‘crossdresser’, 32 others for alleged internet fraud in Lagos (photos)

Operatives of the Lagos Zonal Command of the Economic and Financial Crimes…

The end of the Supreme Court’s authority? – HotAir

As the days go by since the leak of the draft Supreme…