Rep. Jerrold Nadler suggests Justice Clarence Thomas didn’t mention Loving decision because he’s ‘intermarried’ – twitchy.com

Rep. Jerrold Nadler took to the House floor Tuesday to talk about marriage equality and suggested that same-sex and interracial marriage were probably next to be overturned now that Roe v. Wade has finally fallen. Nadler noted that Justice Clarence Thomas didn’t mention the Loving decision in his Dobbs concurrence maybe because he’s intermarried, and so is Sen. Mitch McConnell. Maybe that had something to do with it.

Rep. Nadler said Justice Thomas didn’t mention interracial marriage in his Dobbs concurrence b/c he’s married to a white woman.

“He didn’t mention Loving for some reason…maybe the fact that he’s intermarried and so is Senator McConnell, maybe that had something to do with it.” pic.twitter.com/wvSFyQOqw8

— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) July 19, 2022

Only a Democrat would use a word like “intermarried.” https://t.co/OCd4fPGqDZ

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) July 19, 2022

“Intermarried”?

— Joseph Leavy 🇺🇸1776!🇺🇸 (@JosephLeavy) July 19, 2022

Intermarried tho 🧐

— SSGMARVEL (@mandaleigh0413) July 19, 2022

“Intermarried” Right out of the Klan playbook.

— Cocoa is a dog (@Cocoaisadog) July 19, 2022

“Intermarried”? How about just married? Only racists see race in everything and everywhere. Fact.

— KK Berd 🇺🇸 (@BluebirdKeny) July 19, 2022

What a grotesque person Jerry is.

— Not the Jets General Manager (@NottheJetsGM) July 19, 2022

Racist. You should be ashamed. pic.twitter.com/Xvb2FbMqli

— Lynnie ❤️ 🇺🇸 (@LynnieLorenz) July 19, 2022

Do these white Democrats have any idea how awful they sound? Every day now it’s something revolting.

'height' : 50, 'width' : 320, 'params' : {} }; document.write('');

— Bogedá Tacoblossom (@leilanitexas) July 19, 2022

Remember when they all wore kente cloths in that ridiculous photo-op?

Nadler has been in office over 20 years, another example of the need for term limits for all levels of government.

— Rembrandt van Rijn (@RembrandtvanRi9) July 19, 2022

Or… maybe it’s because Loving v. Virginia was decided upon a totally different constitutional basis than right to privacy cases like Roe, and isn’t in any danger of being overruled. Are we to believe that Nadler, an attorney, doesn’t understand that distinction?

— roguesegue (@roguesegue) July 19, 2022

He didn’t mention Loving because Loving wasn’t decided with substantive due process. It was an equal protection case. His gripe is that substantive due process isn’t a real protection and any case decided in that way needs to be reevaluated.

— Sam Waisanen (@SWaisanen) July 19, 2022

Fat Nadler was better, still a racist piece of crap but he looked funny.

— Badremarks44 (@Roll_RMFT) July 19, 2022

Never fear … now they’ve got Ketanji Brown Jackson, and she’s “intermarried” too, as is Vice President Kamala Harris.

Related:

YAAAS QUEEN! Dana Loesch DRAGS TF out of Jerry Nadler for mansplaining to women that they should just disarm (watch)https://t.co/q46Ac2OfNV

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) June 2, 2022