Thursday's Final Word – HotAir
Up next
Author
Tags

If the illusion is real, let them give you a ride, if they got tabbie appeal, let them be on your side …





Ed: Yeah, I’d bet it will be a couple of days before these progressive clowns formulate an explanation for supporting a Nazi-tatted alleged abuser. The truth is that there is no good explanation to offer. 

===

Jim Geraghty at NRO (this morning): 

“It’s not a secret I’ve had a messy, complicated life,” he told the senators, one of the people said. “The worst of the rumors we’ve all heard are not true.”

I don’t know about you, but that wording does not seem particularly reassuring if you’re a Democrat. First, which rumors was Platner referring to? And if only “the worst” are not true… how about the merely moderately bad? Doesn’t that sound like a de facto concession that some rumors out there are true?

Mind you, in April, Platner assured a supporter that he had no additional scandals or past bad behavior to disclose. … In other words, Platner has twice already assured the public that he has no other scandals he needed to admit, and then the Kik account and sexting came out. If you’re a Democratic senator, why on earth would you believe his assurances now?

Ed: This is the Otter Response in Animal House: “You f****d up, you trusted us!” The question is why anyone trusted a pig-in-a-poke candidate like Platner in the first place. I would guess that Democrat socialists are desperate for candidates that they can sell to younger male voters, and so chose someone whom they think represents the kind of masculinity those voters respect. They have James Talarico on one end of that spectrum and Graham Platner on the other, and in both cases, prove they have no idea what middle Americans see as normal masculinity. 

===





Maine isn’t NJ. Not likely to play that game especially against @SenatorCollins  (who is going to handily beat anyone Dems run against her and always has).

Ed: I actually think Mills had a better shot against Collins than Platner. And it may actually benefit Democrats that this is detonating now, before Tuesday’s primary, when Democrat voters in Maine can still choose Mills. 

===

NY Times: “He said this a lot: If anybody ever broke in here, I would rape them,” she recalled, saying that he added that it would not be in “a sexual way, not in a gay way.”

“He was like, I would rape them to show them that I’m dominant,” she said.

Asked about those remarks, a Platner campaign official did not dispute them. A friend who knew Mr. Platner and Ms. Fifield during that period said the comments sounded out of character.

Mr. Platner, who had overlapping relationships with other women while he and Ms. Fifield dated, also referred to women as “hatchet wounds,” Ms. Fifield said, a crude term for female anatomy.

Ed: Gross. I’ve literally never heard this slang before reading it in the NYT. The fact that the campaign isn’t disputing these remarks, but instead attacking Lyndsey as a “GOP operative,” speaks volumes.

===

Ed: I think that Lyndsey Fifield’s credibility is way too big a problem for flat denials. Also, I think they’re worried that the NYT piece might produce more women who can testify to the same thing. Particularly, the part where Platner referred to women as “hatchet wounds” based on the appearance of their genitalia. Anyone want to ask AOC about that reveal?





===

Fox News: “This is a guy that had a problem with me, how I dress, but he seemed to have no problem posing in a towel at a disgusting website that consistently had serious problems about that kinds of depravity,” Fetterman told Fox News host Sean Hannity.

The Democrat later challenged Platner to make public messages he allegedly exchanged with women on the platform.

“Let me make a deal. I’ll tell P-Hustle, I’ll wear a suit every day, if he releases all those texts and messages that he’s had… [with] the dozen women,” he continued, referencing Platner’s username on the platform.

“You can prove [to] America… what’s [in] these conversations. Can P-Hustle prove how old these people are?”

Ed: Literally the only Democrat with a working radar on common sense sniffed out Platner weeks ago. He warned his colleagues about Platner, and went public early and often to call him out. And now everyone but Fetterman and Janet Mills have Platner’s stink all over them. 

===

Ed: It always (D)oes when it’s (D)ifferent. 

===

Ed: “A measure of grace,” eh? It really IS (D)ifferent. 

===

Glenn Reynolds: Years ago a friend of mine in DC commented that he knew a lot of people who thought they were big shots, because while they were in important government jobs people treated them like big shots. It was nice to be so liked and admired.

Then when they left the important jobs, they didn’t feel nearly so liked and admired anymore. Turned out that what people liked and admired about them wasn’t their personal qualities, but the big shot jobs — or, more specifically, what they hoped the holder of those big shot jobs could do for them. No job, no big shot treatment.





He commented that it was hilarious how often people felt this way, especially since most of them had been dealing with other people in and out of big shot jobs for most of their careers.

Well, that’s Scott Pelley’s situation, but I don’t think he knows it yet.

Ed: Pelley made the mistake of considering himself the indispensable element in his organization. He’s not the first to make that mistake, and he’s not going to be the last, but most people don’t burn a $5 million annual salary in learning the hard way that unless you own the company, you can be replaced. And Pelley’s about to learn that there are very few $5 million jobs in this industry, especially after you become known as a toxic element in a work environment. 

===

Ed: Yes, I pointed this out in my post as well. They ran with the women who claimed he did nothing wrong with them ahead of the abuse claims. The NYT ran the story, so they deserve credit for that, but they basically asterisked it up first and buried the lede. Pelley’s not the only journalistic disgrace. That’s not on the reporters either, but on the NYT’s editors. 

===





Ed: She’s still on the ballot. She’s won statewide elections in the past. One of the biggest questions Democrats and progressives should answer is why they pushed the Nazi-tatted alleged abuser in the first place. 

===

Byron York: “Clearly, Democratic senators are terrified that there is going to be more to come out,” York said Thursday on Fox News’s America Reports. “I think it’s important to point out right now there’s a lot we don’t know about what has come out about this whole sexting stuff.” …

“The primary is actually next Tuesday in Maine, and Platner’s going to win by a big number, and then July 13 comes up, which is the final day that a candidate can leave the race, and then the Democratic Party of Maine could appoint another one, so those are really important dates,” York said.

“You have the Democrats who worry that there’s more but believe that we don’t know enough right now to kick him off the ticket, and then you have others like Fetterman who believe, ‘Yeah, we do know enough right now to kick him off,’” York said.

Ed: Byron spoke before the NYT story dropped, but the Democrats certainly have enough now to demand Platner’s withdrawal. Will they, or will they attack the women who came forward while asking voters to give their favorite Nazi-tatted socialist “a measure of grace”? I think right now it’s even odds. 

===

Ed: I think Duane’s right, assuming Platner actually wins on Tuesday. Get ready for a lot of “old news, asked and answered” narratives if that happens. 





===

Ed: When I saw that yesterday, I knew that they knew what the story would be. The question was whether they could diminish it effectively enough to salvage Platner’s candidacy. Now they’re all about to spend the next several months trying to explain how “it’s (D)ifferent.” Good luck with that. 

===

Ed: Yep. It begins. Tough to use that to explain away Racicot, though. 

===

… and contemporaneous verification of events sourced from multiple women

Ed: With contemporaneous diary entries and text messages, to boot. 

===





===

===

===

Last night’s lyric: “Take It On the Run” by REO Speedwagon.


Editor’s note: If we thought our job in pushing back against the Academia/media/Democrat censorship complex was over with the election, think again. This is going to be a long fight. If you’re digging these Final Word posts and want to join the conversation in the comments — and support independent platforms — why not join our VIP Membership program? Choose VIP to support Hot Air and access our premium content, VIP Gold to extend your access to all Townhall Media platforms and participate in this show, or VIP Platinum to get access to even more content and discounts on merchandise. Use the promo code FIGHT to join or to upgrade your existing membership level today, and get 60% off!



You May Also Like
The Pittsburgh Steelers Should Hate Thursdays With a Fiery Passion

The Pittsburgh Steelers Should Hate Thursdays With a Fiery Passion

Getty Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin watches from the sidelines If…
Last month, the TODAY star wore an adorable, white-and-blue gingham print knit dress by designer Sea New York that retailed for $395

Savannah Guthrie’s favorite looks revealed as she is dubbed ‘morning show style queen’

Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our…
Sabrina Carpenter sizzles in dangerously low backless dress

Sabrina Carpenter sizzles in dangerously low backless dress

Sabrina Carpenter sizzled in a dangerously low backless red dress, which went…
Dr Apul Parikh says 'hybrid filler' HArmonyCa is particularly good for early signs of ageing

‘I’m only 46 but my neck makes me look older!’ Our tweakments expert reveals the relatively painless treatment that banishes saggy skin and lines…

By Inge Van Lotringen Published: 12:07 EDT, 7 July 2024 | Updated:…