New York City Mayor Zohram Mamdani did an interview with ABC’s Jon Karl after the three far-left candidates he supported – two of whom are socialists – won their Democratic primary races.
One of the reasons they were able to do this in NYC is because the Democratic establishment is so used to their candidates just winning in their primaries and people just voting Democrat in the general election, they don’t really have the “get out the vote” thing in hand. So in low voter turnout races, the far left is better at marshalling its people to get out. While that’s not necessarily something you’re going to find in a lot of other places, the fact that the socialists are on the rise, and elsewhere, is a problem for all of us.
Mamdani’s interview with Karl looked like an effort to put a nice face on the threat, where Mamdani tries to mollify us all and act like this is a good thing. Yeah, no, not going to work. But this guy is very slick.
Here he is playing word games about whether he supports there being a state of Israel.
Karl: Israel is a Jewish state. That’s in the charter. Do you support that?
Mamdani: I’ve said time and again that I support the state of Israel as a state with equal rights.
Karl: As jewish state?
Mamdani: I believe that any state that privileges one religion over another is… pic.twitter.com/WFIqM9PAib
— Acyn (@Acyn) June 28, 2026
What I find deeply hypocritical is that while he throws in that he wouldn’t be supportive of Saudi Arabia either, we know it isn’t Saudi Arabia that he and the other leftists are sounding off about all the time. Plus, while Israel is a “Jewish state,” it’s an actual democracy (unlike some of the Islamic countries) where Arabs have the same legal rights as Jews.
Here is Mamdani saying the socialist candidates are offering a “vision” beyond the midterms and 2028, that it goes back to the New Deal (the first real orgy of socialist thought in our government) that can be sold nationally. Oh, goody.
Zohran Mamdani calls for Socialism to be the future of the Democrat party.
MAMDANI: “What these candidates offer is a vision that extends beyond the midterms, that extends beyond 2028…” pic.twitter.com/d8BKHLJN0r
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
He was asked about the crazy things said by Darializa Avila Chevalier, one of the NYC socialists he supported. Among her prior comments, she talked about abolishing prisons and borders. She is also against all deportations, even for criminals. Karl asked if those positions would fly in the Democratic Party.
ABC: Darializa Avila Chevalier called for the abolition of prisons, couldn’t say whether or not somebody who had committed murder should be in prison, called for open borders..
MAMDANI: What I saw from Darializa was a focus on what she describes as a “politics of life.” pic.twitter.com/0Xulj2i8Lt
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
Mamdani shows how they’re just going to justify all of it by saying what he says here – that she’s focused on “working people,” and the “politics of life.”
READ MORE: If You Wondered How Hakeem Jeffries Would Respond to the Socialists, Now We Have an Answer
Boom: Hakeem Jeffries Gets Caught in a Lie and Wrecked Over Response to Socialists
But even Karl sees the problem there: that this isn’t going to fly with Americans in general, even if the Democrats go all in for it. Listen to the load of horse hockey he shovels here, saying they can have “disagreements on policy positions.”
ABC: Abolishing prisons, having open borders…most of Americans won’t go along with that.
MAMDANI: We can have disagreements on policy positions.
ABC: We can disagree on something as basic as we should have prisons?
MAMDANI: There are prisons. pic.twitter.com/QfjzGVj7yZ
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
If even the concept of prisons (or border or deportations) are “up for debate,” then we don’t have a country. That’s an insane take, no matter how smoothly he tries to pitch it.
Here he was himself, questioning the purpose of prisons in August, 2020.
Zohran Mamdani on prisons: “Frankly, what purpose do they serve?”pic.twitter.com/iGU8kTb8Bh https://t.co/phBOGQUlTR
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
Oh, and the Democratic narrative word for the week: it’s a “big tent.”
Zohran Mamdani on his Socialist takeover of the Democrat party:
ABC: “Is there room in the party for both of these views?”
MAMDANI: “Yes…I think what makes our party a beautiful party is the fact that it’s a big tent.” pic.twitter.com/TDGuCYftMn
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
Yet if you don’t agree with their radical positions or candidates, the socialist supporters chant at even House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08) that he was next.
Here’s another socialist candidate for CO-01, Melat Kiros, saying they need to get rid of Democrats who stand in the way of Medicare for all.
Colorado Democrat Congressional candidate Melat Kiros calls to pass Medicare for all and to get rid of any Democrats who oppose it:
“The only way we get Medicare for all passed is by getting rid of the Democrats that are actively standing in that way.” pic.twitter.com/oJHyBwRtnc
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 28, 2026
I guess the big tent only works one way – and that’s to move further left.
Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical Left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.
Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
